Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and Feasibility of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure and Intraspinal Pressure Studies in Cervical Stenosis: A Case Series.
Zipser, Carl Moritz; Spirig, José Miguel; Aguirre, José; Hofer, Anna-Sophie; Pfender, Nikolai; Hupp, Markus; Curt, Armin; Farshad, Mazda; Schubert, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Zipser CM; Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. carlmoritz.zipser@balgrist.ch.
  • Spirig JM; Balgrist University Hospital, University Spine Center, Zurich, Switzerland. carlmoritz.zipser@balgrist.ch.
  • Aguirre J; Balgrist University Hospital, University Spine Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hofer AS; Department of Anesthesiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Pfender N; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hupp M; Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Curt A; Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Farshad M; Balgrist University Hospital, University Spine Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schubert M; Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 131: 367-372, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839876
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) leads to functional impairment by compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. In DCM, the dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and intraspinal pressure (ISP), as well as spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) remain not investigated yet. Recent technical advances have enabled investigation of these parameters in acute spinal cord injury (SCI). We aim to investigate the properties of CSFP/ISP and spinal cord hemodynamics during and after decompressive surgery in DCM. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Four patients with DCM were enrolled; during surgery and 24 h postoperative, ISP at level was measured in one patient, and CSFP was measured in two patients. In one patient, CSFP was recorded at bedside before surgery.

RESULTS:

All measurements were conducted without adverse events and were well tolerated. With CSFP analysis, post-decompression Queckenstedt's test was responsive in two patients (i.e., jugular vein compression resulted in an elevation of CSFP pressure). In the patient whose CSFP was tested at bedside, Queckenstedt's test was not responsive before decompression. Individual optimum SCPPs were calculated to be between 70 and 75 mmHg.

CONCLUSION:

ISP and CSFP can reflect spinal compression and sufficient decompression. A better understanding and systematic monitoring possibly lead to improved hemodynamic management and may allow early recognition of postoperative complications such as swelling and bleeding.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pressão do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurochir Suppl Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pressão do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurochir Suppl Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça