Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized trial regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB).
Baten, E; Van der Aa, F; Goethuys, H; Slabbert, K; Arijs, I; van Renterghem, K.
Afiliação
  • Baten E; Associatie Urologie Hageland, Kapellekensweg 10, Kessel-Lo, Belgium. Evert.baten@gmail.com.
  • Van der Aa F; U Hasselt, Martelarenlaan 45, 3050, Hasselt, Belgium. Evert.baten@gmail.com.
  • Goethuys H; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Slabbert K; ZOL Genk, Genk, Belgium.
  • Arijs I; Associatie Urologie Hageland, Kapellekensweg 10, Kessel-Lo, Belgium.
  • van Renterghem K; Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
World J Urol ; 39(10): 3839-3844, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839918
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine whether omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in TURB is safe in patients undergoing TURB without an indwelling pre-operative catheter/nephrostomy/DJ and a negative pre-operative urinary culture. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A multi-centered randomized controlled trial (RCT) from 17-09-2017 to 31-12-2019 in 5 hospitals. Patients with a pre-operative indwelling catheter/DJ-stent or nephrostomy and a positive pre-operative urinary culture (> 104 uropathogens/mL) were excluded. Post-operative fever was defined as body temperature ≥ 38.3 °C. A non-inferiority design with a 6% noninferiority margin and null hypothesis (H0) that the infection risk is at least 6% higher in the experimental (E) than in the control (C) group; H0 C (AMP-group) - E (no AMP-group) ≥ Δ (6% noninferiority margin). A multivariable, logistic regression was performed for AMP and post-TURB fever with covariates tumor size and (clot-) retention. The R Project® for statistical computing was used for statistical analysis and a p value of 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS:

459 Patients were included and 202/459 (44.1%) received AMP vs 257/459 (55.9%) without AMP. Fever occurred in 6/202 [2.9%; 95% CI (1.2-6.6%)] patients with AMP vs 8/257 [3.1%; 95% CI (1.5%-6.1%)] without AMP (p = 0.44). Multivariable, logistic regression showed no significant harm in omitting AMP when controlled for (clot-)retention and tumor size (p = 0.85) and an adjusted risk difference in developing post-TURB fever of 0.0016; 95% CI [- 0.029; 0.032].

CONCLUSION:

Our data suggest the safety of omitting AMP in patients undergoing TURB without an indwelling, pre-operative catheter/nephrostomy/DJ and a negative pre-operative urinary culture.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica / Infecções Urinárias / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Antibioticoprofilaxia / Cistoscopia / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica / Infecções Urinárias / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Antibioticoprofilaxia / Cistoscopia / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica