Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of zirconia implant surface topography on first bone implant contact within a prospective cohort study.
Rohr, Nadja; Balmer, Marc; Jung, Ronald E; Kohal, Ralf J; Spies, Benedikt C; Hämmerle, Christoph H F; Fischer, Jens.
Afiliação
  • Rohr N; Biomaterials and Technology, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Balmer M; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Jung RE; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kohal RJ; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Spies BC; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Hämmerle CHF; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Fischer J; Biomaterials and Technology, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 23(4): 593-599, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34047019
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although 5-year clinical data exist for different zirconia implants, no analysis has yet been performed focusing on how the surface topography of the implant affects clinical parameters.

PURPOSE:

To analyze the influence of zirconia implant topography on first bone implant contact (fBIC). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In a prospective two-center cohort investigation 63 zirconia implants were evaluated at implant placement, prosthetic delivery, 1, 3, and 5 years. The distance (DIB) between implant shoulder and fBIC was measured at each time point in periapical radiographs at mesial and distal sites. Two-way ANOVA/Bonferroni was used to analyze the effects of time and center (α < 0.05).

RESULTS:

Between the centers, the mean DIB varied significantly at implant placement (Freiburg [FR] 1.4 ± 0.6 mm; Zurich [ZH] 0.8 ± 0.5 mm). Thereafter, no statistically significant difference in DIB was observed, neither between centers nor between time points (prosthetic delivery FR 1.9 ± 0.6 mm, ZH 1.7 ± 0.8 mm; 1 year FR 1.8 ± 0.6 mm, ZH 1.6 ± 0.8 mm; 3 years FR 1.9 ± 0.8 mm, ZH 1.7 ± 0.8 mm; 5 years FR 1.9 ± 0.8 mm, ZH 1.8 ± 0.6 mm). The overall mean DIB at prosthetic delivery to 5 years of both centers (1.8 ± 0.7 mm) is located within the transition zone between the smooth neck and the moderately rough intraosseous part (1.6-2.0 mm from the implant shoulder). However, individual DIB values are ranging from 0.1 to 4.2 mm overlapping the transition zone.

CONCLUSIONS:

The standard deviation of the DIB indicates that the fBIC establishes on moderately rough and smooth surfaces. Consequently, soft tissue adapts to both topographies as well.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Planejamento de Prótese Dentária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Planejamento de Prótese Dentária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça