Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of the changes in retention and surface topography of attachments for maxillary 4-implant-retained overdentures.
Kuo, Hsin-Yu; Kuo, Po-Jan; Bittner, Nurit; Cavallaro, John.
Afiliação
  • Kuo HY; Assistant Professor, College of Dental Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: selene0113@gmail.com.
  • Kuo PJ; Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Periodontology, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Bittner N; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Program Director Postgraduate Prosthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  • Cavallaro J; Clinical Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
J Prosthet Dent ; 126(3): 413.e1-413.e9, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127250
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Restoring the edentulous maxilla with an implant-retained overdenture (IRO) can present a challenge because of increased implant divergence and the added wear of the implant abutments and attachments. However, knowledge pertaining to the degree of implant divergence and its effects on the wear pattern of the implant attachments is lacking.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the change in the retention and wear characteristics of unsplinted abutments and attachments when used to retain a maxillary 4-implant palateless complete removable overdenture with different implant angulations. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Three groups of specimens of 0-, 15-, and 30-degree implant angulations were evaluated, each with 7 specimens. The retention of specimens was recorded after aging cycles equivalent to 1, 2.5, and 6 years of use. The surface of the attachments was examined with light and scanning electron microscope (SEM).

RESULTS:

Increasing the interimplant divergence improved the initial retention. After 1 year of use, retention of the 15- and 30-degree groups was significantly higher than that of the 0-degree group (P<.05). No significant difference in retention was found between the 15- and 30-degree groups (P>.05). After 2.5 and 6 years of use, no significant difference in retention was noted between groups (P>.05). Under light and SEM examination, the wear of the abutments and attachments was related to the interimplant divergence.

CONCLUSIONS:

The initial retention of single attachments increased significantly as the implant divergence increased. The retention of the 15- and 30-degree groups was significantly higher than that of the 0-degree group after 1 year of use. No significant difference in retention was found after 2.5 and 6 years, regardless of implant angulation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Revestimento de Dentadura Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Revestimento de Dentadura Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article