Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
E-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement treatment as harm reduction interventions for smokers who find quitting difficult: randomized controlled trial.
Myers Smith, Katie; Phillips-Waller, Anna; Pesola, Francesca; McRobbie, Hayden; Przulj, Dunja; Orzol, Marzena; Hajek, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Myers Smith K; Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Phillips-Waller A; Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Pesola F; Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • McRobbie H; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Przulj D; Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Orzol M; Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Hajek P; Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Addiction ; 117(1): 224-233, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187081
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

The majority of smokers accessing the current best treatments continue to smoke. We aimed to test if e-cigarettes (EC) compared with nicotine replacement treatment (NRT) can help such smokers to reduce smoking.

DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial of EC (n = 68) versus NRT (n = 67) with 6-month follow-up.

SETTING:

Stop smoking service in London, UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 135 smokers (median age = 40 years, 51% male) previously unable to stop smoking with conventional treatments.

INTERVENTIONS:

Participants received either NRT of their choice (8-week supply) or an EC starter pack and instructions to purchase further e-liquids of strength and flavours of their choice themselves. Products were accompanied by minimal behavioural support. MEASUREMENTS Participants who reported that they stopped smoking or reduced their daily cigarette consumption by at least 50% at 6-month follow-up were invited to provide a carbon monoxide (CO) reading. The primary outcome was biochemically validated reduction in smoke intake of at least 50% at 6 months and the main secondary outcome was sustained validated abstinence at 6 months. Drop-outs were included as 'non-reducers'.

FINDINGS:

Validated smoking reduction (including cessation) was achieved by 26.5 versus 6.0% of participants in the EC and NRT study arms, respectively [relative risk (RR) = 4.4, P = 0.005, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-12.4]. Sustained validated abstinence rates at 6 months were 19.1 versus 3.0% (RR = 6.4, P = 0.01, 95% CI = 1.5-27.3). Product use was high and equal in both study arms initially, but at 6 months allocated product use was 47% in the EC arm versus 10% in the NRT arm (χ2(1)  = 22.0, P < 0.001), respectively. Adverse events were minor and infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS:

In smokers unable to quit using conventional methods, e-cigarettes were more effective than nicotine replacement therapy in facilitating validated long-term smoking reduction and smoking cessation when limited other support was provided.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Addiction Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Addiction Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido