Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A European Multicenter Study.
Williet, Nicolas; Petrillo, Angelica; Roth, Gaël; Ghidini, Michele; Petrova, Mila; Forestier, Julien; Lopez, Anthony; Thoor, Audrey; Weislinger, Lucie; De Vita, Ferdinando; Taieb, Julien; Phelip, Jean Marc.
Afiliação
  • Williet N; Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France.
  • Petrillo A; Department of Precision Medecine, University of Study of Campania «L. Vanvitelli¼, 81100 Naples, Italy.
  • Roth G; Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Grenoble, 38043 Grenoble, France.
  • Ghidini M; Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Hospital of Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy.
  • Petrova M; Department of Medical Oncology, MHAT Nadezhda, 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Forestier J; Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69622 Lyon, France.
  • Lopez A; Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • Thoor A; Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Grenoble, 38043 Grenoble, France.
  • Weislinger L; Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • De Vita F; Department of Precision Medecine, University of Study of Campania «L. Vanvitelli¼, 81100 Naples, Italy.
  • Taieb J; Department of Gastroenterology and Gastro-Intestinal Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75004 Paris, France.
  • Phelip JM; Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(11)2021 Jun 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34199796
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are two standard first-line therapies for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) but have rarely been compared, especially in patients with locally advanced PC (LAPC).

METHODS:

This is a retrospective European multicenter study including patients with LAPC treated with either GN or FFX as the first-line therapy between 2010 and 2019. Coprimary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

A total of 147 patients (GN n = 60; FFX n = 87) were included. Tumor resection rates were similar between the two groups (16.7% vs. 16.1%; p = 1), with similar R0 resection rates (88.9%). Median PFS rates were not statistically different 9 months (95% CI 8-13.5) vs. 12.1 months (95% CI 10.1-14.6; p = 0.8), respectively. Median OS rates were 15.7 months (95% CI 12.6-20.2) and 16.7 months (95% CI 14.8-20.4; p = 0.7), respectively. Abdominal pain at the baseline (HR = 2.03, p = 0.03), tumors located in the tail of the pancreas (HR = 4.35, p = 0.01), CA19-9 > 200 UI/L (HR = 2.03, p = 0.004) and tumor resection (HR = 0.37, p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, similarly to OS. CA19-9 ≤ 200 UI/L (OR = 2.6, p = 0.047) was predictive of the tumor response. Consolidation chemoradiotherapy, more often used in the FFX group (11.7% vs. 50.6%; p < 0.001), was not predictive.

CONCLUSION:

This retrospective study did not show any difference between GN and FFX as the first-line treatment in patients with LAPC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França