Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for clinical stage I esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mei, Li-Xiang; Mo, Jun-Xian; Chen, Yong; Dai, Lei; Wang, Yong-Yong; Chen, Ming-Wu.
Afiliação
  • Mei LX; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Mo JX; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Chen Y; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Dai L; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Wang YY; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Chen MW; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Dis Esophagus ; 35(3)2022 Mar 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34318324
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy are commonly used in the treatment of stage I esophageal cancer (EC). The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy as the initial treatment for clinical stage I EC. METHODS: This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020197203). Relevant studies were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from database inception to June 30, 2020. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was employed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was employed to compare treatment-related death, complications, and tumor recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 13 non-randomized controlled studies involving 3,346 patients were included. Compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy, esophagectomy showed an improved OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P < 0.001), PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67; P < 0.001), and a lower risk of tumor recurrence (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75-1.65; P = 0.60) and treatment-related death (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.31-4.30; P = 0.84) between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence shows esophagectomy has superior survival benefits as the initial treatment for clinical stage I EC. It is still the preferred choice for patients with clinical stage I EC. However, future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China