Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anterior Shoulder Instability Part II-Latarjet, Remplissage, and Glenoid Bone-Grafting-An International Consensus Statement.
Hurley, Eoghan T; Matache, Bogdan A; Wong, Ivan; Itoi, Eiji; Strauss, Eric J; Delaney, Ruth A; Neyton, Lionel; Athwal, George S; Pauzenberger, Leo; Mullett, Hannan; Jazrawi, Laith M.
Afiliação
  • Hurley ET; NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA; Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: eoghanhurley@rcsi.ie.
  • Matache BA; Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Wong I; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Itoi E; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
  • Strauss EJ; NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Delaney RA; Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Neyton L; Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.
  • Athwal GS; Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Pauzenberger L; Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Mullett H; Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Jazrawi LM; NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Arthroscopy ; 38(2): 224-233.e6, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332052
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a modified Delphi process on the Latarjet procedure, remplissage, and glenoid-bone grafting for anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A consensus process on the treatment utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted, with 65 shoulder surgeons from 14 countries across 5 continents participating. Experts were assigned to one of 9 working groups defined by specific subtopics of interest within anterior shoulder instability. RESULTS: The technical approaches identified in the statements on the Latarjet procedure and glenoid bone-graft were that a subscapularis split approach should be utilized, and that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required. Furthermore, despite similar indications, glenoid bone-grafting may be preferred over the Latarjet in patients with bone-loss greater than can be treated with a coracoid graft, and in cases of surgeon preference, failed prior Latarjet or glenoid bone-grafting procedure, and epilepsy. In contrast, the primary indications for a remplissage procedure was either an off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs lesion without severe glenoid bone loss. Additionally, in contrast to the bone-block procedure, complications following remplissage are rare, and loss of shoulder external rotation can be minimized by performing the tenodesis via the safe-zone and not over medializing the fixation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 89% of statements reached unanimous or strong consensus. The statements that reached unanimous consensus were the prognostic factors that are important to consider in those undergoing a glenoid bone-grafting procedure including age, activity level, Hill-Sachs Lesion, extent of glenoid bone-loss, hyperlaxity, prior surgeries, and arthritic changes. Furthermore, there was unanimous agreement that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required with a glenoid bone graft, but it may be beneficial in some cases. There was no unanimous agreement on any aspect related to the Latarjet procedure or Remplissage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Luxação do Ombro / Articulação do Ombro / Instabilidade Articular Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arthroscopy Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Luxação do Ombro / Articulação do Ombro / Instabilidade Articular Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arthroscopy Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article