Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment Choice of Complete Distal Forearm Fractures in 8 to 14 Years Old Children.
Liu, Ya; Zhang, Fu-Yong; Zhen, Yun-Fang; Zhu, Lun-Qing; Guo, Zhi-Xiong; Wang, Xiao-Dong.
Afiliação
  • Liu Y; Department of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 41(9): e763-e767, 2021 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34354028
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

New surgical techniques have challenged traditional guidelines for nonsurgical treatment in pediatric and adolescent distal forearm fractures. This study was performed to compare outcomes and costs between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and closed reduction with casting in the treatment of complete distal forearm fractures in children 8 to 14 years old.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed of 175 displaced distal forearm fractures treated with 2 different methods in the emergency department of a children's trauma center. One hundred and fourteen children were managed using CRPP. The remaining 61 were treated with closed reduction and casting. All patients had initial follow-up radiographs. The quality of reduction and the residual angulation in both the coronal and sagittal planes were recorded. Outcomes included the angulation after reduction, residual angulation at final follow-up, radiation exposure, total immobilization time, days absent from school, total costs, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS:

The postreduction sagittal plane angulation was significantly lower in the CRPP group (P=0.037). While residual deformity between the groups at the 6-month final follow-up was not significantly different in either the sagittal or coronal planes (P=0.486, 0.726), patients in the nonoperative group received greater radiation than those in the operative group (P<0.001). Patients in the nonoperative group missed fewer classes and sustained lower costs (P<0.001, <0.001). The mean immobilization time in each group was not significantly different (31.4±4.4 vs. 32.8±5.9 d; P=0.227).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the postreduction quality was a little better and radiation exposure was less in the CRPP group, there was no difference between the 2 groups in angulation, total immobilization time, or complication rates after 6 months. The cost and time absent from school of patients in the nonoperative group was significantly lower than in the operative group. There is no clear advantage to CRPP treatment on outcomes. Therefore, closed reduction and casting is recommended in complete distal forearm fractures of children 8 to 14 years old. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-therapeutic study.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas do Rádio / Fraturas Ósseas / Traumatismos do Antebraço Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Orthop Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas do Rádio / Fraturas Ósseas / Traumatismos do Antebraço Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Orthop Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China