Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity.
Miroshnychenko, Anna; Rae, Charlene; Riff, Karen Wong; Forrest, Christopher; Goodacre, Tim; Swan, Marc; Slator, Rona; Goldstein, Jesse; Thoma, Achilleas; Harman, Karen; Klassen, Anne.
Afiliação
  • Miroshnychenko A; 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Rae C; 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Riff KW; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
  • Forrest C; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
  • Goodacre T; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK.
  • Swan M; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Spires Cleft Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, England, UK.
  • Slator R; Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK.
  • Goldstein J; 6595University of Pittsburgh, PA (Pitt), PA, USA.
  • Thoma A; 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Harman K; 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Klassen A; 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 60(3): 327-335, 2023 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919453
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales.

DESIGN:

Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study that tested hypotheses regarding correlations of scores with other PROMs that measure related constructs.

SETTING:

Seven cleft centres in Canada, the USA, and UK were involved. PATIENTS/

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients were aged eight to 29 years with CL/P.

INTERVENTIONS:

Before undergoing rhinoplasty, orthognathic, cleft lip scar revision, and alveolar bone graft, participants were asked to complete the following PROMs CLEFT-Q (9 scales), Child Oral Health Impact Profile (socio-emotional subscale) and Cleft Hearing Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (features 1 subscale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The correlation coefficients examining the relationship between the scales were the main outcome measures. Correlations (Spearman) were calculated and interpreted as follows <0.3 weak, 0.30 to 0.50 moderate, ≥0.50 strong.

RESULTS:

Participants (n = 177) were mostly male (61%) and aged between eight and 11 years (42%). Overall, 38 of 52 (73%) hypotheses tested were supported. More specifically, 20 of 26 (77%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance scales were supported, two of three (67%) hypotheses about correlations between the health-related quality of life scales were supported, and 16 of 23 (70%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance and health-related quality of life scales were supported.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales adds further evidence of the psychometric properties of this instrument.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenda Labial / Fissura Palatina Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenda Labial / Fissura Palatina Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá