Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for the Contemporary Age of Multiple Myeloma.
Baljevic, Muhamed; Sborov, Douglas W; Lim, Ming Y; Hillengass, Jens; Martin, Thomas; Castillo, Jorge J; Streiff, Michael B; Kumar, Shaji K; Callander, Natalie S.
Afiliação
  • Baljevic M; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Sborov DW; Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Lim MY; Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Hillengass J; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
  • Martin T; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Castillo JJ; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Streiff MB; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine and Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Kumar SK; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; and.
  • Callander NS; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(1): 91-95, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991076
ABSTRACT
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication in all patients with cancer. Compared with the general population, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have a 9-fold increase in VTE risk, likely because of their malignancy, its treatments, and other additional patient-related factors. In MM, thromboembolism events tend to occur within 6 months of treatment initiation, regardless of treatment regimen; however, the use of immunomodulatory agents such as thalidomide or lenalidomide, especially in combination with dexamethasone or multiagent chemotherapy, is known to create a significant risk for VTE. Currently, official recommendations for VTE prophylaxis in MM outlined in various national guidelines or multidisciplinary society panels are based on expert opinion, because data from randomized controlled trials are scarce. Large studies which have mainly focused on the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer at higher risk for VTE either had a very low representation of patients with MM, or excluded them all together, limiting our ability to draw evidence-based conclusions on how to effectively protect MM population from VTE. In this brief perspective, we highlight some of the greatest challenges that have hampered the field concerning the availability of high-quality clinical trial data for the formulation of best VTE prophylaxis strategies in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as well as the rationale for the latest updates in the NCCN Guidelines on this topic.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tromboembolia Venosa / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tromboembolia Venosa / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article