Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.
Vaiarelli, Alberto; Cimadomo, Danilo; Gennarelli, Gianluca; Guido, Maurizio; Alviggi, Carlo; Conforti, Alessandro; Livi, Claudia; Revelli, Alberto; Colamaria, Silvia; Argento, Cindy; Giuliani, Maddalena; De Angelis, Carlo; Matteo, Maria; Canosa, Stefano; D'Alfonso, Angela; Cimadomo, Valentino; Rienzi, Laura; Ubaldi, Filippo Maria.
Afiliação
  • Vaiarelli A; GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy. alberto.vaiarelli@gmail.com.
  • Cimadomo D; GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
  • Gennarelli G; GeneraLife IVF, Livet, Turin, Italy.
  • Guido M; MeSVA Department, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Alviggi C; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Conforti A; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Livi C; GeneraLife IVF, Centro Demetra, Florence, Italy.
  • Revelli A; GeneraLife IVF, Livet, Turin, Italy.
  • Colamaria S; Obstetrics and Gynaecology SCDU1, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Argento C; GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
  • Giuliani M; GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
  • De Angelis C; GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
  • Matteo M; Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Operative Unit of Obstetrics, Fabia Mater Clinic, Rome, Italy.
  • Canosa S; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Physiopathology and Reproductive Unit, University Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • D'Alfonso A; GeneraLife IVF, Livet, Turin, Italy.
  • Cimadomo V; MeSVA Department, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Rienzi L; BNY Mellon, Krakow, Poland.
  • Ubaldi FM; GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 39(3): 663-673, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35128583
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Our primary objective was to assess whether immediately undergoing a second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) for advanced-maternal-age and/or poor-ovarian-reserve (AMA/POR) patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts for preimplantation-genetic-testing-for-aneuploidies (PGT-A) is more efficient than the conventional-approach.

METHODS:

All AMA/POR patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts after conventional-stimulation between 2017 and 2019 were proposed DuoStim, and 143 couples accepted (DuoStim-group) and were matched for the main confounders to 143 couples who did not accept (conventional-group). GnRH-antagonist protocol with recombinant-gonadotrophins and agonist trigger, intra-cytoplasmatic-sperm-injection (ICSI) with ejaculated sperm, PGT-A and vitrified-warmed euploid single-blastocyst-transfer(s) were performed. The primary outcome was the cumulative-live-birth-delivery-rate per intention-to-treat (CLBdR per ITT) within 1 year. If not delivering, the conventional-group had 1 year to undergo another conventional-stimulation. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS:

The CLBdR was 10.5% in the conventional-group after the first attempt. Only 12 of the 128 non-pregnant patients returned (165 ± 95 days later; drop-out = 116/128,90.6%), and 3 delivered. Thus, the 1-year CLBdR was 12.6% (N = 18/143). In the DuoStim-group, the CLBdR was 24.5% (N = 35/143; p = 0.01), 2 women delivered twice and 13 patients have other euploid blastocysts after a LB (0 and 2 in the conventional-group). DuoStim resulted in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of 23,303€. DuoStim was costlier and more effective in 98.7% of the 1000 pseudo-replicates generated through bootstrapping, and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves unveiled that DuoStim would be more cost-effective than the conventional-approach at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 23,100€.

CONCLUSIONS:

During PGT-A treatments in AMA/POR women, DuoStim can be suggested in progress to rescue poor blastocyst yields after conventional-stimulation. It might indeed prevent drop-out or further aging between attempts.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blastocisto / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Assist Reprod Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blastocisto / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Assist Reprod Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália