Efficacy of Extended Modification in Left Hemihepatectomy for Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison Between H12345'8'-B-MHV and H1234-B.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the prognostic impact of the tumor exposure at the liver transection margin (LTM) in left-sided perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of middle hepatic vein (MHV) resection on this exposure. BACKGROUND: In perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, tumors are unexpectedly exposed at the LTM during left hemihepatectomy (LH). METHODS: Patients who underwent LH for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma during 2002 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. LH was classified into conventional and extended types, which preserved and resected the MHVs, respectively. Positive LTM was defined as the involvement of invasive carcinoma at the liver transection plane and/or the adjacent Glissonean pedicle exposed. The clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were compared between procedures. RESULTS: Among 236 patients, conventional and extended LHs were performed in 198 and 38 patients, respectively. The LTM was positive in 31 (13%) patients, with an incidence of 14% versus 8% ( P = 0.432) and 24% versus 0% in advanced tumors ( P = 0.011). Tumor size ≥ 18 mm ( P = 0.041), portal vein invasion ( P = 0.009), and conventional LH ( P = 0.028) independently predicted positive LTM. In patients with negative LTM, the survival was comparable between the two groups 60.4% versus 59.2% at 3 years ( P = 0.206), which surpassed 17.7% for those with positive LTM in the conventional group ( P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LTM status was an independent prognostic factor ( P = 0.009) along with ductal margin status ( P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The LTM status is an important prognostic factor in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Extended LH reduced the risk of tumor exposure at the LTM with a subsequent improvement in the survival, particularly in advanced tumors.