Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Case Study on Reviewing Specialist Services Commissioning in Wales: TAVI for Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Ryczek, Edyta; Peirce, Susan C; Knight, Laura; Cleves, Andrew; Champion, Andrew; Doull, Iolo; Lewis, Sian.
Afiliação
  • Ryczek E; , York, UK.
  • Peirce SC; Cedar, Cardiff Medicentre, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK. Peirces@cardiff.ac.uk.
  • Knight L; Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
  • Cleves A; Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
  • Champion A; Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee, Pontypridd, UK.
  • Doull I; Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee, Pontypridd, UK.
  • Lewis S; Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee, Pontypridd, UK.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 20(4): 487-499, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35211878
ABSTRACT
The Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee (WHSSC) is responsible for planning, commissioning and funding specialised healthcare in Wales. Investment in new technologies or services is based on clinical and economic evidence, using a consistent and transparent process. This is accomplished in three stages. The first stage is the preparation of a rapid evidence review. This then informs the development or update of the relevant Commissioning Policy. The final stage is to prioritise the Commissioning Policy recommendations against all other new services and interventions, to inform WHSSC's annual commissioning intentions. In 2017, a review was conducted of the WHSSC Commissioning Policy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. Prior to this only high-risk patients were eligible for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The rapid evidence review identified three randomised controlled trials and two economic analyses relevant to the decision problem. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was generally found to be more expensive and more effective than medical management or surgical aortic valve replacement, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios around £10,500-£36,000 for inoperable groups and £17,000-£24,000 in high-risk groups. The rapid evidence review, expert advice and stakeholder feedback informed the revision process of the Commissioning Policy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. This recommended the addition of patients unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement and the removal of explicit risk scoring. This recommendation was subject to the prioritisation process (carried out annually). The updated transcatheter aortic valve implantation recommendation was ranked second out of 23 technologies and services competing for additional WHSSC funding. The WHSSC Integrated Commissioning Plan for specialised services in Wales (2019) therefore included funding to support the new criteria for transcatheter aortic valve implantation treatment.
In Wales, specialised health services are selected and funded at a national level by the Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee. Specialised services are provided for small numbers of patients, requiring highly specialised professionals or technologies. When the aortic heart valve becomes narrowed with disease it can be replaced with an artificial valve. This normally requires open surgery, which is risky for some patients, particularly those who are frail. Since 2012, the Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee have funded a less invasive procedure called TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) for patients who could have open surgery but at a high risk. In 2017, this policy needed updating, thus a new evidence review was conducted. This showed that patients at high risk from open surgery were more likely to survive if they underwent TAVI. Others, for whom open surgery was too risky, were also more likely to survive if they underwent TAVI instead of medication. However, TAVI tended to produce more vascular problems, such as blockages or damage to blood vessels. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is generally more effective and more expensive than either drugs or open surgery in these patient groups, but is within cost-effectiveness limits often used in the UK National Health Service. As a result of the review, experts recommended that TAVI should be available to more patients, which would require greater levels of funding. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was ranked as second out of 23 new or updated treatments competing for funding allocations. The Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee therefore published a new Commissioning Plan for TAVI in 2019 that now included patients who are considered too risky to undergo open surgery.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido