Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short-term outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in robotic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang, Y; Li, L; Su, Q; Liu, Y; Yin, H; Wu, D.
Afiliação
  • Liang Y; Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • Li L; Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
  • Su Q; Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • Yin H; Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • Wu D; Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. wud1@sj-hospital.org.
Tech Coloproctol ; 26(7): 529-535, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35347491
ABSTRACT
Ileocolic anastomosis is performed via extracorporeal or intracorporeal techniques in robotic right hemicolectomy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) for robotic right colectomy. The EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically (from inception until March 1, 2020) for randomized and non-randomized control trials reporting the short-term outcomes of IA and EA for robotic right colectomy. Five observational cohort studies involving 585 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to the EA group, the IA group showed significantly longer operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) 28.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.88-43.89, p = 0.0002], lower rate of anastomotic leak (odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.85, p = 0.03), and shorter time to first flatus (WMD - 0.57, 95% CI - 0.95 to 0.19, p = 0.003). However, pooled results revealed no difference in blood loss, complications, wound infection, incisional hernia, length of incision, and hospital stay between the IA and EA groups (p < 0.05). This meta-analysis indicated that IA was superior to EA in terms of anastomotic leak and time to first flatus, but inferior in terms of operation time. Large-scale, multicenter, randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Neoplasias do Colo / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Tech Coloproctol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Neoplasias do Colo / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Tech Coloproctol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China