Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions for delirium: A systematic literature review of economic evaluations.
Kinchin, Irina; Edwards, Layla; Hosie, Annmarie; Agar, Meera; Mitchell, Eileen; Trepel, Dominic.
Afiliação
  • Kinchin I; Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Edwards L; Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Hosie A; Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT) Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
  • Agar M; Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT) Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
  • Mitchell E; School of Nursing Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Trepel D; St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 147(5): 430-459, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35596552
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Little is known about the economic value of clinical interventions for delirium. This review aims to synthesise and appraise available economic evidence, including resource use, costs, and cost-effectiveness of interventions for reducing, preventing, and treating delirium.

METHODS:

Systematic review of published and grey literature on full and partial economic evaluations. Study quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS).

RESULTS:

Fourteen economic evaluations (43% full, 57% partial) across nine multicomponent and nonpharmacological intervention types met inclusion criteria. The intervention costs ranged between US$386 and $553 per person in inpatient settings. Multicomponent delirium prevention intervention and the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) reported statistically significant cost savings or cost offsets somewhere else in the health system. Cost savings related to inpatient, outpatient, and out-of-pocket costs ranged between $194 and $6022 per person. The average CHEERS score was 74% (±SD 10%).

CONCLUSION:

Evidence on a joint distribution of costs and outcomes of delirium interventions was limited, varied and of generally low quality. Directed expansion of health economics towards the evaluation of delirium care is necessary to ensure effective implementation that meets patients' needs and is cost-effective in achieving similar or better outcomes for the same or lower cost.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Delírio Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Psychiatr Scand Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Delírio Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Psychiatr Scand Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda