Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment-related communication experiences and expectations among Indian cancer patients receiving radiation therapy and their family members: A qualitative study.
Chawak, Shweta; Chittem, Mahati; Dhillon, Haryana; Huilgol, Nagraj; Butow, Phyllis.
Afiliação
  • Chawak S; Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: chawakshweta@gmail.com.
  • Chittem M; Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.
  • Dhillon H; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence based, Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Huilgol N; Chief Radiation Oncologist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Balabhai Nanavati Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Butow P; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence based, Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patient Educ Couns ; 105(9): 2913-2922, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597700
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore Indian cancer patients' and their primary family caregivers' (PFC) experiences and expectations of treatment-related communication with their physician while undergoing radiation therapy.

METHODS:

Participants, comprising patient-PFC dyads (n = 32), patients only (n = 33) and PFC only (n = 7), were recruited from one hospital in Mumbai, India. Semi-structured interviews explored participants' perceived role in cancer-related decision-making, diagnosis and prognosis communication experiences with the physician, communication expectations of their treating physician, and information needs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the framework approach.

RESULTS:

Main themes included (i) patients' passive role in treatment communication, (ii) family as an integral part of the medical consultation, and (iii) dyads' expectations and beliefs about the role of the physician.

CONCLUSION:

Indian cancer patients played a passive role in treatment decision-making while physicians were seen as primary medical decision-makers. Further, PFCs provided the final consent for the treatment plan and acted as a mediator/moderator between the patient-physician. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings suggest the need for (i) interventions such as question prompt lists that may improve patient activation and caregiver preparedness, and (ii) triadic communication training interventions for optimal communication between the three stakeholders (i.e., patient, physician and PFC).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Motivação / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Motivação / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article