Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Training of radiotherapy professionals: status, content, satisfaction and improvement suggestions in the Greater Region.
Dubois, Nadège; Nguyet Diep, Anh; Ghuysen, Alexandre; Declaye, Joséfine; Donneau, Anne-Françoise; Vogin, Guillaume; Fleckenstein, Jochen; Coucke, Philippe; Ben Mustapha, Selma.
Afiliação
  • Dubois N; Medical Simulation Center of Liège, Department of Public Health, Liège University, Liège, Belgium. nadege.dubois@chuliege.be.
  • Nguyet Diep A; Department of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
  • Ghuysen A; Medical Simulation Center of Liège, Department of Public Health, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
  • Declaye J; Medical Simulation Center of Liège, Department of Public Health, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
  • Donneau AF; Department of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
  • Vogin G; UMR 7365 CNRS-UL IMOPA, Biopole, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
  • Fleckenstein J; Centre National de Radiothérapie du Luxembourg, Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg.
  • Coucke P; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
  • Ben Mustapha S; Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 485, 2022 Jun 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35733149
BACKGROUND: The initial training of Radiation Oncology professionals can vary widely across Europe. The aim of this study was to assess the status and content of the initial training programs currently implemented in the Greater Region: Lorraine (Nancy, France), Saarland (Homburg, Germany), Luxembourg, and Liège (Wallonia, Belgium). METHODS: A survey was developed to investigate (1) the overall satisfaction, learning objectives, and teaching methods used during initial training programs and (2) the perceptions of the importance of key professional competencies as described by the CanMEDS (a framework that identifies and describes the abilities physicians require to effectively meet the health care needs of the people they serve). In addition, open-ended questions were used to elicit opinions on room for improvement. Participants (N = 38) were physicians (radiation oncologists (RO) seniors and residents) and radiation therapists (RTTs). RESULTS: Only 21.1% of the respondents declared having acquired all the competencies required for their professional practice during their initial training. Heterogeneity in teaching methods was noted within professional programs but there is no difference between those from RO and RTT in the teaching of technical and relational skills. Relational skills were not addressed in a range of 39.5-57.9% of respondent's curricula. More practical lessons were deemed necessary to improve radiotherapy (RT) training programs. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncology professionals expressed the need for more practical teaching, especially in the training of non-technical skills. Regarding the perceived importance of professional aptitudes, radiation oncology professionals highlighted medical and relational skills as the most important competencies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica