Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expected Cost Savings From Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scan Screening for Lung Cancer in Alberta, Canada.
Thanh, Nguyen Xuan; Pham, Truong-Minh; Waye, Arianna; Tremblay, Alain; Yang, Huiming; Dean, Michelle L; Wasylak, Tracy; Sangha, Randeep; Stewart, Douglas.
Afiliação
  • Thanh NX; Strategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Pham TM; Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Waye A; Innovation Evidence Impact, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Tremblay A; Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Yang H; Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Program, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada.
  • Dean ML; Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Wasylak T; Glans-Look Lung Cancer Research, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Sangha R; Strategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Stewart D; Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
JTO Clin Res Rep ; 3(7): 100350, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35769390
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The expensive modern therapeutic regimens for advanced lung cancer (LC) stages have been recently approved. We evaluated whether low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) LC screening of high-risk Albertans is cost saving.

Methods:

We used a decision analytical modeling technique with a health system perspective and a time horizon of 3 years to compare benefits associated with reduced health service utilization (HSU) from earlier diagnosis to the costs of screening. Using patient-level data, HSU costs by stage of disease were estimated for patients with LC, including inpatient, outpatient, and physician services, and costs for prescription drugs and cancer treatments.

Results:

Of 101,000 people aged 55 to 74 years eligible for screening, an estimated 88,476 scans would be performed in Alberta in 3 years. Given LDCT sensitivity and specificity of 90.5% and 93.1%, respectively, we estimated that a stage shift toward earlier diagnosis would be expected whereby 43% more patients would be identified at stage 1 or 2 as compared with without screening. The estimated cost of screening is $35.6 million (M), whereas the stage shift associated with screening would avoid $42M in HSU costs. The net cost avoidance associated with screening is therefore $6.65M. The probability for the screening to be cost saving is estimated at 72%.

Conclusions:

This study has revealed that LDCT LC screening is likely to be cost saving in Alberta. Adoption of this program into the provincial health care system is worth considering provided constraints in the system related to surgical capacity and CT wait times could be addressed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: JTO Clin Res Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: JTO Clin Res Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá