Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitivity to Deaf Culture Among Otolaryngology and Audiology Trainees.
Epstein, Sherise; Johnson, Luke M; Sie, Kathleen C Y; Norton, Susan J; Ou, Henry C; Horn, David L.
Afiliação
  • Epstein S; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Johnson LM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Sie KCY; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Norton SJ; Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Ou HC; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Horn DL; Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 132(6): 648-656, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35822616
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The Deaf community is an ethnolinguistic minority group. Low sensitivity to Deaf culture contributes to health disparities among Deaf patients. This study determines the level of sensitivity to Deaf culture among otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) and audiology trainees.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional survey study of OHNS and audiology trainees from 10 large US institutions. Trainees were queried on their exposure to and comfort with Deaf patients and their education on, attitude toward, and awareness and knowledge of Deaf culture. Sensitivity to Deaf culture was operationalized as awareness and knowledge of Deaf culture. These were assessed using a 35-item instrument that was previously developed using a d/Deaf community-based participatory approach to research. We used T-tests to compare the sample to previous samples of medical students with training in Deaf culture (MS-TDCs) and general practitioners (GPs).

RESULTS:

There were 91 completed surveys (response rate 44.5%). Almost all were aware of Deaf culture (97.8%). The mean knowledge score was 55.0% (standard deviation (SD) 13.4%), which was significantly higher than that for GPs at 43.0% (SD 15.0%) (95% confidence interval 8.1%, 15.8%, P < .0001) but significantly lower than that for MS-TDCs at 69.0% (SD 13.0%)(CI -20.3%, -7.6%, P < .0001). Knowledge scores were comparable for OHNS and audiology trainees (P = .09).

CONCLUSION:

This sample of OHNS and audiology trainees was more sensitive to Deaf culture than GPs but less sensitive than MS-TDCs. Developing specialty-specific education may be warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Otolaringologia / Audiologia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Otolaringologia / Audiologia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos