Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation® for Temporomandibular Disorders.
Sekito, Florence; Pintucci, Marco; Pirri, Carmelo; Ribeiro de Moraes Rego, Mariana; Cardoso, Mayra; Soares Paixão, Kenia; Ribeiro da Silva, Valquiria; Stecco, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Sekito F; Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil.
  • Pintucci M; Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil.
  • Pirri C; Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
  • Ribeiro de Moraes Rego M; Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil.
  • Cardoso M; Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil.
  • Soares Paixão K; Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro da Silva V; Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, Brazil.
  • Stecco A; Rusk Rehabilitation, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 9(7)2022 Jun 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35877330
ABSTRACT

Background:

To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation® (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial.

Methods:

The study consisted of 28 patients that were divided in two groups (Group 1 Fascial Manipulation® vs. Group 2 conventional TMD treatment). The Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), RDC/TMD, electromyography (EMG) and Pression/Pain Evaluation on Masseter and Temporalis Muscle were assessed with different times.

Results:

In both groups, the improvement in pain was evident on the VRS scale (p < 0.0001) and pain-free opening (p < 0.001). In Group 1, the recovery of the function was faster; maximum unassisted opening T0 vs. T1 (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:

FM® can be used as an effective method for facial pain, being a rapid, safe and cost-effective approach to reduce pain, gain function and mouth opening that can be used prior to occlusion stabilization appliances.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Bioengineering (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Bioengineering (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil