Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic value of lymph node density on cancer staging system for gastric cancer without distal metastasis: a population-based analysis of SEER database.
Liu, Yuhua; Cui, Hao; Xu, Xinxin; Liang, Wenquan.
Afiliação
  • Liu Y; Chinese PLA General Hospital & Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
  • Cui H; Institution of Hospital Management, Department of Medical Innovation and Research, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
  • Xu X; Chinese PLA General Hospital & Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
  • Liang W; Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
World J Surg Oncol ; 20(1): 325, 2022 Sep 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36175896
BACKGROUND: Accurate tumor staging is the cornerstone of tumor treatment. Current tumor staging system for gastric cancer (GC) is based on regional positive lymph nodes while ignoring the total number of examined lymph nodes. We aim to assess the prognostic value of lymph node density (LND), the ratio of positive nodes to the total number examined nodes, in GC without distal metastasis. METHODS: Clinical information of patients with histologically confirmed GC and without distal metastasis was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. The X-Tile software was used to identify the ideal prognosis-related cutoff point for LND. The prognostic value of LND on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in Cox regression models. Subgroup analysis stratified by LND was performed on current lymph node staging system to further explore the interaction between LND and current lymph node staging system. RESULTS: A total of 4281 participants were identified from the SEER database for the final analysis. The optimal prognosis-related cutoff values of LND were calculated as 0.1 and 0.4, and LND was divided into three levels: LND1 (< 0.1), LND2 (> = 0.1, < 0.4), and LND3 (> = 0.4). LND3 was associated with worse CSS and OS in GC patients. Compared to patients with LND1, those with LND2 and LND3 had 2.43 (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 2.09-2.84, P < 0.001) and 4.69 (HR = 4.69, 95% CI 4.02-5.48, P < 0.001) folds increase in mortality in CSS, respectively. Similar results were found in the evaluation of OS in GC patients. Subgroup analysis stratified by LND also found that patients in the same current lymph node stage still had different prognosis due to the different LND levels after adjustment for other prognosis-related covariates (all P values < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LND is an independent prognostic factor for GC without distal metastasis. In the current lymph node staging system, LND has potential value in further accurately classifying GC patients without distal metastasis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China