Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Smoking and Risk of Coronavirus Infection and Illness in a Highly Controlled Challenge Study: A Re-analysis of the British Cold Study.
Dove, Melanie S; Leistikow, Bruce N; Khan, Nossin; Tong, Elisa K.
Afiliação
  • Dove MS; Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Leistikow BN; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Khan N; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Tong EK; Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 25(6): 1198-1201, 2023 05 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194540
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Meta-analyses have shown an association between smoking and the risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease severity, but the risk of smoking and coronavirus infection is less clear. AIMS AND

METHODS:

We re-analyzed data from the British Cold Study, a 1986-1989 challenge study that exposed 399 healthy adults to 1 of 5 "common cold" viruses (including n = 55 for coronavirus 229E). Participants with cotinine levels below 15 ng/mL (noncurrent smokers) were compared with participants with higher cotinine levels or self-reported smoking (current smokers). We calculated overall and coronavirus-specific unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (RRs) for current smoking and each outcome (infection and illness), and tested whether each association was modified by the type of respiratory virus.

RESULTS:

Current smokers had a higher adjusted risk than noncurrent smokers for infection (adjusted RR [aRR] = 1.12, 95% CI 1.01, 1.25) and illness (aRR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.11, 1.96). Neither association was modified by an interaction term for smoking and type of virus (infection p = .44, illness p = .70). The adjusted RR estimates specific to coronavirus 229E for infection (aRR = 1.22, 95% CI .91, 1.63) and illness (RR = 1.14, 95% CI .62, 2.08) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

These RRs provide estimates of the strength of associations between current smoking and infection and illness that can be used to guide tobacco control decisions. IMPLICATIONS Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have found an association between smoking and COVID-19 disease severity, but fewer studies have examined infection and illness. The British Cold Study, a high-quality challenge study that exposed healthy volunteers to respiratory viruses including a coronavirus, provides an opportunity to estimate the RR for current smoking and infection and illness from coronaviruses and other viruses to guide tobacco control decisions. Compared with noncurrent smokers, current smokers had a 12% increased risk of having a laboratory-confirmed infection and a 48% increased risk of a diagnosed illness, which was not modified by the type of respiratory virus including a coronavirus.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos