Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review.
Truchot, Jennifer; Boucher, Valérie; Li, Winny; Martel, Guillaume; Jouhair, Eva; Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane; Petrosoniak, Andrew; Emond, Marcel.
Afiliação
  • Truchot J; Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Université Laval Faculté de médecine, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
  • Boucher V; Emergency Department, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
  • Li W; Emergency Department, CHU Cochin- Université de Paris, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Martel G; Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
  • Jouhair E; Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
  • Raymond-Dufresne É; Centre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
  • Petrosoniak A; 5Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Emond M; Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Université Laval Faculté de médecine, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Open ; 12(7): e059442, 2022 07 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36219737
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN:

Scoping review.

METHODS:

Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine. INFORMATION SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science.

RESULTS:

A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá