Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accelerating the Improvement of Human Well-Being in China through Economic Growth and Policy Adjustment.
Wu, Luhua; Wang, Shijie; Bai, Xiaoyong; Luo, Guangjie; Wang, Jinfeng; Chen, Fei; Li, Chaojun; Ran, Chen; Zhang, Sirui.
Afiliação
  • Wu L; School of Economics and Management, Tongren University, Tongren 554300, China.
  • Wang S; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China.
  • Bai X; Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding 562100, China.
  • Luo G; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China.
  • Wang J; Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding 562100, China.
  • Chen F; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China.
  • Li C; Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding 562100, China.
  • Ran C; Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic State Monitoring of Watershed, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China.
  • Zhang S; School of Economics and Management, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553004, China.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36231869
Human well-being in many countries lags behind the gross domestic product (GDP) due to the rapid changes in the socio-economic environment that have occurred for decades. However, the mechanisms behind this complex phenomenon are still unclear. This study revealed the changes in human well-being in China from 1995 to 2017 by revising the genuine progress indicator (GPI) at the national level and further quantified the contribution of interfering factors that have driven the increase in the GPI. The results indicated that: (1) The per capita GPI of China showed an increasing trend with an annual growth rate of 12.43%. The changes in the GPI followed the same pattern as economic development, rather than presenting the phenomenon of economic growth combined with a decline in welfare that has been recorded in some countries and regions. (2) The increase in human well-being was mainly driven by economic growth, but it was most sensitive to social factors. (3) Increasing income inequality and the cost of lost leisure time contributed obvious negative impacts (24.69% and 23.35%, respectively) to the per capita GPI. However, the increase in personal consumption expenditures, the value of domestic labor, ecosystem service value, and net capital growth accelerated the rise in the GPI, with positive contribution rates of 30.69%, 23%, 20.54%, and 20.02%, respectively. (4) The continuous increase in economic investment and the strengthening of social management due to policy adjustments completely counteracted the negative impacts on human well-being, thus leading to a great increase in the per capita GPI. Such insights could provide theoretical support for decision making and policy implementation to improve global human well-being.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenvolvimento Econômico / Ecossistema Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenvolvimento Econômico / Ecossistema Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China