Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System.
Chin, Elizabeth T; Leidner, David; Lamson, Lauren; Lucas, Kimberley; Studdert, David M; Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D; Andrews, Jason R; Salomon, Joshua A.
Afiliação
  • Chin ET; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Leidner D; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Lamson L; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Lucas K; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Studdert DM; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Andrews JR; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
  • Salomon JA; From the Departments of Biomedical Data Science (E.T.C.) and Health Policy (L.L., D.M.S., J.D.G.-F., J.A.S.) and the Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine (J.R.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford Law School (D.M.S.), Stanford, the California Department of Corr
N Engl J Med ; 387(19): 1770-1782, 2022 11 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36286260
BACKGROUND: Information regarding the protection conferred by vaccination and previous infection against infection with the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is limited. METHODS: We evaluated the protection conferred by mRNA vaccines and previous infection against infection with the omicron variant in two high-risk populations: residents and staff in the California state prison system. We used a retrospective cohort design to analyze the risk of infection during the omicron wave using data collected from December 24, 2021, through April 14, 2022. Weighted Cox models were used to compare the effectiveness (measured as 1 minus the hazard ratio) of vaccination and previous infection across combinations of vaccination history (stratified according to the number of mRNA doses received) and infection history (none or infection before or during the period of B.1.617.2 [delta]-variant predominance). A secondary analysis used a rolling matched-cohort design to evaluate the effectiveness of three vaccine doses as compared with two doses. RESULTS: Among 59,794 residents and 16,572 staff, the estimated effectiveness of previous infection against omicron infection among unvaccinated persons who had been infected before or during the period of delta predominance ranged from 16.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 23.7) to 48.9% (95% CI, 41.6 to 55.3). Depending on previous infection status, the estimated effectiveness of vaccination (relative to being unvaccinated and without previous documented infection) ranged from 18.6% (95% CI, 7.7 to 28.1) to 83.2% (95% CI, 77.7 to 87.4) with two vaccine doses and from 40.9% (95% CI, 31.9 to 48.7) to 87.9% (95% CI, 76.0 to 93.9) with three vaccine doses. Incremental effectiveness estimates of a third (booster) dose (relative to two doses) ranged from 25.0% (95% CI, 16.6 to 32.5) to 57.9% (95% CI, 48.4 to 65.7) among persons who either had not had previous documented infection or had been infected before the period of delta predominance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in two high-risk populations suggest that mRNA vaccination and previous infection were effective against omicron infection, with lower estimates among those infected before the period of delta predominance. Three vaccine doses offered significantly more protection than two doses, including among previously infected persons.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prisões / Vacinação / Vacinas contra COVID-19 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prisões / Vacinação / Vacinas contra COVID-19 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article