Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decrementally cost-effective health technologies in non-inferiority studies: A systematic review.
Darlington, Meryl; Scarica, Raffaele; Chavez-Pacheco, Xyomara; Blamplain Segar, Laeticia; Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle.
Afiliação
  • Darlington M; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Clinical Research Unit Eco Ile de France, Paris, France.
  • Scarica R; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Clinical Research Unit Eco Ile de France, Paris, France.
  • Chavez-Pacheco X; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Clinical Research Unit Eco Ile de France, Paris, France.
  • Blamplain Segar L; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Clinical Research Unit Eco Ile de France, Paris, France.
  • Durand-Zaleski I; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Clinical Research Unit Eco Ile de France, Paris, France.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 1025326, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36545305
ABSTRACT

Background:

HTA guidance has generally been driven by situations where innovative and usually more expensive technologies are compared to the prevailing standards of care. Cheaper and less efficacious interventions have received scarce attention, although strategies with minimal individual efficacy losses might produce collective health gains when savings are redistributed.

Purpose:

This systematic review of health economic evaluations identified interventions that are both cost and outcome reducing to procure a list of candidate decrementally cost-effective technologies. Data Sources English language searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov covering 2005 to September 2021. Study Selection Full economic evaluations reporting in English decrementally cost-effective health technologies based on RCT data, modelling or mixed methods. Data

Synthesis:

After filtering 4,975 studies found through the systematic database search, 107 decrementally cost-effective health technologies (HTs) were identified. Nearly a third were services (n = 29) and similarly for drugs (n = 31). For over half of the studies (n = 54) health outcomes were measured in QALYs and the cost-utility ratios varied from €140 to €5 million saved per QALY lost, albeit with time horizons varying from 4 days of follow-up to lifetime extrapolations. Less than a quarter of the studies were carried out from the societal perspective.

Limitations:

Despite including ClinicalTrials.gov as data source, unpublished studies may have been missed.

Conclusions:

Our results show a growth in recent years in the number of economic publications demonstrating decrementally cost-effective HTs. Economic tools are needed to facilitate the adoption of such HTs by policy-makers at the national level to maximise health outcomes at the population level. Systematic Review Registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=95504, identifier CRD42018095504.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França