Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dry needling for the treatment of acute myofascial pain syndrome in general practitioners' clinics: a cohort study.
Yehoshua, Ilan; Rimon, Oded; Mizrahi Reuveni, Miri; Peleg, Roni; Adler, Limor.
Afiliação
  • Yehoshua I; Department of Family Medicine, Maccabi Healthcare Service, 27 Hamered Street, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Rimon O; Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
  • Mizrahi Reuveni M; Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
  • Peleg R; Department of Family Medicine, Maccabi Healthcare Service, 27 Hamered Street, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Adler L; Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
BMC Prim Care ; 23(1): 339, 2022 12 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36572860
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Musculoskeletal pain is one of the leading complaints in the ambulatory setting. There are many ways to treat it, including pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches. Dry needling (DN) is an option that is easy to learn, cheap and has a good safety profile. The aim of this study was to assess the association between DN performed by GPs for acute myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and pain relief and to evaluate factors associated with treatment success.

METHODS:

In this prospective cohort study, two GPs performed DN in their clinics. Patients were asked to rank their pain using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) before, 10-min and 1-week after the procedure. The SF-MPQ index consists of 3 parts; visual analog scale (VAS), pain rating index (PRI) and present pain intensity (PPI). Logistic regressions were performed to assess the variables associated with short- and medium- term success.

RESULTS:

Fifty two patients were recruited from September 2019 until August 2020. VAS was 6.0 ± 2.3 (before), 4.1 ± 2.5 (10-min after) and 2.6 ± 2.71 (1-week after), P < 0.05. PRI was 17 ± 9.1 (before), 10.8 ± 8.5 (10-min after) and 5.1 ± 6.5 (1-week after), P < 0.05. PPI was 2.6 ± 1.0 (before), 1.7 ± 1.0 (10-min after) and 1.1 ± 1.2 (1-week after), P < 0.05. Short-term success was associated with the physician who performed the procedure (OR 10.08, 95% CI 1.15,88.4) and with the use of a single needle (vs. multiple needles inserted) (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.03,20.11). Medium-term success was associated with being a native born (non-immigrant), OR 8.59, 95% CI 1.11,66.28 and with high level of initial pain, OR 11.22, 95% CI 1.82,69.27.

CONCLUSION:

Our study demonstrated improvement in acute pain 10-min and 1-week after DN performed by a GP, in all parts of the SF-MPQ. Therefore, we believe DN is a good therapeutic option for GPs to aid patients suffering from MPS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibromialgia / Clínicos Gerais / Agulhamento Seco / Síndromes da Dor Miofascial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibromialgia / Clínicos Gerais / Agulhamento Seco / Síndromes da Dor Miofascial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel