Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue.
Ubels, Sander; Matthée, Eric; Verstegen, Moniek; Klarenbeek, Bastiaan; Bouwense, Stefan; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I; Daams, Freek; Dekker, Jan Willem T; van Det, Marc J; van Esser, Stijn; Griffiths, Ewen A; Haveman, Jan Willem; Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard; Siersema, Peter D; Wijnhoven, Bas; Hannink, Gerjon; van Workum, Frans; Rosman, Camiel; Heisterkamp, Joos; Polat, Fatih; Schouten, Jeroen; Singh, Pritam.
Afiliação
  • Ubels S; Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Sander.Ubels@radboudumc.nl.
  • Matthée E; Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Verstegen M; Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Klarenbeek B; Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Bouwense S; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • van Berge Henegouwen MI; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Daams F; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Dekker JWT; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • van Det MJ; Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group, Almelo, the Netherlands.
  • van Esser S; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Griffiths EA; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Haveman JW; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Nieuwenhuijzen G; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Siersema PD; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Wijnhoven B; Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hannink G; Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Workum F; Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Rosman C; Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Heisterkamp J; Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Polat F; Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Schouten J; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Singh P; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 49(5): 974-982, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36732207
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences.

METHODS:

TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment.

RESULTS:

FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4).

CONCLUSION:

Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esofagectomia / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esofagectomia / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article