Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Small airway dysfunction in asthmatic patients treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy: A perfect storm.
Cottini, Marcello; Lombardi, Carlo; Comberiati, Pasquale; Landi, Massimo; Berti, Alvise; Ventura, Laura.
Afiliação
  • Cottini M; Allergy and Pneumology Outpatient Clinic, Bergamo, Italy. Electronic address: cottinimarcello@gmail.com.
  • Lombardi C; Departmental Unit of Allergology, Immunology & Pulmonary Diseases, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
  • Comberiati P; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pediatrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Landi M; Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy; Pediatric National Healthcare System, Turin, Italy.
  • Berti A; Centre for Medical Sciences (CISMED), Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, and Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, Italy. Electronic address: alvise.berti@apss.tn.it.
  • Ventura L; Department of Statistics, University of Padova, Italy.
Respir Med ; 209: 107154, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36796546
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Short-acting beta agonist (SABA)-only treatment is associated with poor asthma control and adverse clinical outcomes. The importance of small airway dysfunction (SAD) is increasingly recognized in asthma, but less is known in patients using SABA-only therapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of SAD on asthma control in an unselected cohort of 60 adults with physician-diagnosed intermittent asthma treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy.

METHODS:

All patients underwent standard spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) at the first visit and were stratified by the presence of SAD defined by IOS (fall in resistance 5-20 Hz [R5-R20]>0.07 kPa × s*L-1). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze cross-sectional relationships between clinical variables and SAD.

RESULTS:

SAD was present in 73% of the cohort. Compared with patients without SAD, adults with SAD had a higher number of severe exacerbations (65.9% versus 25.0%, p < 0.05), higher use of annual SABA canisters (median (IQR), 3 (1.75-3) versus 1 (1-2), p < 0.001), and significantly less well-controlled asthma (11.7% versus 75.0%, p < 0.001). Spirometry parameters were similar between patients with IOS-defined SAD and those without SAD. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction symptoms (EIB, odds ratio [OR] 31.18; 95%CI4.85-365.00) and night awakenings due to asthma (OR 30.30; 95%CI2.61-1141.00) were independent predictors of SAD, with a high predictive power of the model incorporating these baseline predictors (AUC 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS:

EIB and nocturnal symptoms are strong predictors of SAD in asthmatic patients using as-needed SABA-monotherapy, helping to distinguish subjects with SAD among patients with asthma when IOS cannot be performed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article