Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Team-based Learning Approach During Pediatric Clerkship to Promote Clinical Reasoning.
Forbes, Karen L; Foulds, Jessica L.
Afiliação
  • Forbes KL; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: kf3@ualberta.ca.
  • Foulds JL; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(7): 1459-1464, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37031888
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical reasoning skills are essential to medical practice. The problem lies in assuming junior medical students with limited experience develop clinical reasoning and decision-making skills passively and solely through clinical exposure. To prepare learners for independent practice and care for future patients, explicit teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning in low-stakes, collaborative learning environments are needed.

METHODS:

The key-feature question (KFQs) format is an assessment approach that focuses on the reasoning and decision-making aspects of medical problems rather than knowledge recall. This report describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a team-based learning (TBL) approach using KFQs to foster clinical reasoning in the third-year pediatric clerkship at our institution.

RESULTS:

Over the first 2 years of implementation (2017-18, 2018-19), 278 students participated in TBL sessions. Mean individual student scores significantly improved in the group setting for both academic years (P < .001). Individual scores were moderately positively correlated with their total summative Objective Structured Clinical Examination score (r[275] = 0.51; P < .001). The correlation between individual score and their multiple-choice question examination was weaker at 0.29 (P < .001) but remained positive.

CONCLUSIONS:

A TBL session using KFQs to both teach and assess clinical reasoning in clerkship students may help educators identify students with gaps in knowledge and/or reasoning. The next steps include developing and implementing individualized coaching opportunities, and expanding this approach within the undergraduate medical curriculum. Outcome measures to assess clinical reasoning in authentic patient encounters require further research and development.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Acad Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Acad Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article