Evaluation of the widths of the mucosal strips in pathological examination of specimens of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric cancer in Japan. Pathological evaluation of ESD specimens is considered essential to determine if additional gastrectomy is necessary. Usually, specimens resected by ESD are sliced into 2-3 mm wide sections, and each section is examined for depth of tumor and lymphovascular invasion. Nevertheless, in most cases of additional gastrectomy, lymph node metastasis is not present. Given that there are few-studies on how clinical-decisions based on the pathologic-evaluation-method, in particular the specimen cut-width, influence patient outcomes, we retrospectively evaluated whether reducing the number of cuts to one-half or one-third would result in underestimation of the real need for additional surgery. The effect of the actual cut-width on recommended treatment (referral to operation) and patient-outcomes was also assessed. METHODS: Pathological records of 498 lesions from 439 patients were reviewed and re-evaluated. All pathological descriptions are based on the gastric cancer classification system of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 15th edition. RESULTS: In 5.8% and 8.5% of the total specimens, underdiagnosis of tumor-depth and lymphovascular invasion occurred when the number of sections was reduced to one-half and one-third, respectively. Significantly more submucosal invasions were found in the group in which the cut-with was between 3 and 4 mm than in the group in which the cut width was less than 3 mm. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the appropriate cut-width is important and should be discussed from the standpoint of labor costs and lost opportunities to search for molecular markers in ESD materials.