Value of frontal QRS axis for risk stratification of individuals with prolonged PR interval.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing controversy regarding the prognostic value of PR prolongation among individuals free of cardiovascular diseases. It is necessary to risk-stratify this population according to other electrocardiographic parameters. METHODS: This study is based on the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed and Kaplan-Meier method was used. RESULTS: A total of 6188 participants (58.1 ± 13.1 years; 55% women) were included. The median frontal QRS axis of the entire study population was 37° (IQR 11-60°). PR prolongation was present in 7.6% of the participants, of whom 61.2% had QRS axis ≤37°. In a multivariable-adjusted model, mortality risk was highest in the group with concomitant prolonged PR interval and QRS axis ≤37° (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.39). In models with similar adjustment where population were reclassified depending on PR prolongation and QRS axis, prolonged PR interval and QRS axis ≤37° was still associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.36) compared with normal PR interval. CONCLUSIONS: QRS axis is an important factor for risk stratification in population with PR prolongation. The extent to which this population with PR prolongation and QRS axis ≤37° is at higher risk of death compared with the population without PR prolongation.