Distribution patterns of occlusal contact areas on natural posterior teeth - Evaluations of a cross-sectional population-based study with the Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS).

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of our investigations is to optimize the anatomical basis for the design of a sufficient occlusal relationship, especially in view of the innovative technologies by analyzing the occlusal contact point patterns at cusp structures according to A-, B-, C- localization tooth by tooth on the individual occlusal surfaces in the posterior region in static habitual occlusal position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 3300 subjects of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP 1) the interocclusal registration in habitual intercuspation using silicone registration was used and analyzed by using the special evaluation software Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS II). Chi square test was used to investigate whether the distribution of contact areas differed in the group of premolars or molars - each considered separately for maxilla and mandible - on the basis of the probability of error p < 0.05. RESULTS: In 709 subjects (446 male with a mean age of 48.9 ± 13.04 years; 283 female with a mean age of 52.4 ± 14.23 years) the antagonistic situation was specifically considered on natural posterior teeth without conservative or restorative-prosthetic interventions, i.e. without caries, fillings, crowns or other restorations. On the basis of these subjects, the silicone registrations were analyzed using GEDAS II. For the first and second upper molars, the ABC contact distribution was the most frequent 20.4 % for the first and 15.3 % for the second molar. The second most frequent contact area for maxillary molars was area 0. The upper molars had contact areas only at the maxillary palatal cusp (B-/C-contacts). This contact relationship was most frequent in the maxillary premolar (18.1-18.6 %). In mandibular premolars, with the buccal cusps areas A and B were frequently involved (15.4-16.7 %). Mandibular molars showed a frequent contact pattern involving all A-, B-, C- and 0- contact areas (13.3-24.2 %). To capture the possible influence of the antagonistic dentition situation, the antagonistic situation was specifically considered and except for the mandibular premolars (p < 0.05) the contact distribution did not differ for molars and maxillary premolars regarding the dental status of the antagonistic teeth. Natural posterior teeth without occlusal contacts were observed from 20.0 % in the second lower molars to 9.7 % in the first upper molars. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a clinically relevant due to the fact, that this study is the first population-based epidemiological study to analyze the occlusal contact point patterns at cusp structures according to A-, B-, C- localization tooth by tooth on the individual occlusal surfaces in the posterior region in static habitual occlusal position in order to optimize the anatomical basis for the design of a sufficient occlusal relationship.