Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Access to novel cancer medicines in four countries in Central and Eastern Europe in relation to clinical benefit.
Hofmarcher, T; Szilagyiova, P; Gustafsson, A; Dolezal, T; Rutkowski, P; Baxter, C; Karamousouli, E.
Afiliação
  • Hofmarcher T; IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: thomas.hofmarcher@ihe.se.
  • Szilagyiova P; MSD, s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Gustafsson A; IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden.
  • Dolezal T; Value Outcomes s.r.o., Praha 2, Czech Republic.
  • Rutkowski P; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Baxter C; MSD (UK) Limited, London, UK.
  • Karamousouli E; MSD Greece, Alimos, Greece.
ESMO Open ; 8(4): 101593, 2023 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37413761
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Almost 100 novel cancer medicines have been approved in Europe over the last decade. Limited public health care resources in countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) call for a prioritization of access to effective medicines. We investigated how both reimbursement status and waiting time to reimbursement correlate with the magnitude of clinical benefit provided by novel medicines in four selected countries (Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 124 indications of 51 cancer medicines with marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency in 2011-2020 were included and followed up until 2022. Data on reimbursement status and waiting time to reimbursement (i.e. time from marketing authorization to national reimbursement approval) were collected for each country. Data were analyzed in relation to clinical benefit status (i.e. substantial versus nonsubstantial clinical benefit) of indications according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).

RESULTS:

The degree of reimbursement differed between countries with 64% of indications with reimbursement in Czechia, 40% in Hungary, 51% in Poland, and 19% in Slovakia. In all countries, a significantly greater proportion of indications with a substantial clinical benefit was reimbursed (P < 0.05). The median waiting time to reimbursement ranged from 27 months in Poland to 37 months in Hungary. No significant differences in waiting time in relation to clinical benefit were observed in any country (P = 0.25-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS:

Cancer medicines with a substantial clinical benefit are more likely to be reimbursed in all four CEE countries. Waiting times to reimbursement are equally long for medicines with or without a substantial clinical benefit, indicating a lack of prioritization of fast access to medicines delivering a substantial benefit. Incorporation of the ESMO-MCBS in reimbursement assessments and decisions could aid in better utilization of limited resources to deliver more effective cancer care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article