Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes following therapeutic intervention of post-traumatic vasospasm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Riordan, Katherine; Mamaril-Davis, James; Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro; Dumont, Travis M; Weinand, Martin E.
Afiliação
  • Riordan K; College of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Mamaril-Davis J; College of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Aguilar-Salinas P; Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center / University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Dumont TM; Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center / University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Weinand ME; Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center / University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States. Electronic address: mweinand@arizona.edu.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 232: 107877, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37441930
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Vasospasm occurrence following traumatic brain injury may impact neurologic and functional recovery of patients, yet treatment of post-traumatic vasospasm (PTV) has not been well documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the current evidence regarding favorable outcome as measured by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores following treatment of PTV.

METHODS:

A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included manuscripts were methodically scrutinized for quality; occurrence of PTV; rate of favorable outcome following each treatment modality; and follow-up duration. Treatments evaluated were calcium channel blockers (CCBs), endovascular intervention, and dopamine-induced hypertension. Outcomes were compared via the random-effects analysis.

RESULTS:

Fourteen studies with 1885 PTV patients were quantitatively analyzed 982 patients who received tailored therapeutic intervention and 903 patients who did not receive tailored therapy. For patients undergoing treatment, the rate of favorable outcome was 57.3 % (500/872 patients; 95 % CI 54.1 - 60.6 %) following administration of CCBs, 94.1 % (16/17 patients; 95 % CI 82.9 - 100.0 %) following endovascular intervention, and 54.8 % (51/93 patients; 95 % CI 44.7 - 65.0 %) following dopamine-induced hypertension. Of note, the endovascular group had the highest rate of favorable outcome but was also the smallest sample size (n = 17). Patients who received tailored therapeutic intervention for PTV had a higher rate of favorable outcome than patients who did not receive tailored therapy 57.7 % (567/982 patients; 95 % CI 54.1 - 60.8 %) versus 52.0 % (470/903 patients; 95 % CI 48.8 - 55.3 %), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The available data suggests that tailored therapeutic intervention of PTV results in a favorable outcome. While endovascular intervention of PTV had the highest rate of favorable outcome, both CCB administration and dopamine-induced hypertension had similar lower rates of favorable outcome.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos