Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Highly Purified Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HP-hMG) Versus Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in US Predicted High-Responder Patients: A Cost-Comparison Analysis.
Khair, Andrew; Brown, Tray; Markert, Marie; Barsøe, Carsten Rødseth; Daftary, Gaurang S; Heiser, Patrick W.
Afiliação
  • Khair A; Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 100 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ, 07054, USA.
  • Brown T; Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Ltd., Cardiff, UK.
  • Markert M; Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Barsøe CR; Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Daftary GS; Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Heiser PW; Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 100 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ, 07054, USA. Patrick.Heiser@ferring.com.
Pharmacoecon Open ; 7(5): 851-860, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37480456
OBJECTIVES: Infertility imposes considerable clinical and economic burden, and the high costs of fertility care are a major barrier to payers. This study assessed the cost differences of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols in predicted high-responders from the US payer perspective. METHODS: A discrete event simulation model was built to perform a cost-comparison analysis of HP-hMG versus rFSH in a cohort of predicted high-responders undergoing up to three embryo transfer cycles, informed by efficacy data from the MEGASET-HR trial. The model considered an event-based treatment pathway and transition probabilities were derived from MEGASET-HR. A variable time horizon was employed, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses conducted. RESULTS: Subjects undergoing COS with HP-hMG and rFSH demonstrated comparable live birth rates following three in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, with 161 live births with HP-hMG and 152 live births with rFSH, per 310 high-responders. The total cost saving per live birth in subjects receiving HP-hMG versus rFSH was US$3024. These cost savings were largely driven by the need for fewer embryo transfers to achieve similar efficacy outcomes and a reduced rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Following deterministic sensitivity analysis, HP-hMG remained cost saving in all baseline parameter variations. No parameters led to rFSH providing cost savings when compared with HP-hMG. CONCLUSION: Comparable clinical outcomes can be achieved at a lower cost when using HP-hMG versus rFSH based COS protocols in a cohort of predicted high-responders. Such cost savings may reduce the economic burden infertility currently presents to US healthcare providers and those seeking fertility care.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoecon Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoecon Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos