Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of smoking cessation services for women who smoke during pregnancy.
Bailey, Cheryl; Medeiros, Poliana de Barros; Ellwood, David A; Middleton, Philippa; Andrews, Christine J; Flenady, Vicki J.
Afiliação
  • Bailey C; Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Medeiros PB; Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Ellwood DA; Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Middleton P; Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Andrews CJ; School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University and Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Flenady VJ; Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(6): 737-745, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37621216
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although many pregnant women accept referrals to stop-smoking support, the uptake of appointments often remains low.

AIM:

The aim was to review the success of interventions to increase the uptake of external stop-smoking appointments following health professional referrals in pregnancy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and CINAHL were searched in February 2023 for studies with interventions to increase the uptake rates of external stop-smoking appointments among pregnant women who smoke. Eligible studies included randomised, controlled, cluster-randomised, quasi-randomised, before-and-after, interrupted time series, case-control and cohort studies. Cochrane tools assessing for bias and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.

RESULTS:

Two before-and-after studies were included, including a combined total of 1996 women who smoked during pregnancy. Both studies had a serious risk of bias, and meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. One study testing carbon monoxide monitors and opt-out referrals showed increased uptake of external stop-smoking appointments, health professional referrals and smoking cessation rates compared to self-identified smoking status and opt-in referrals. Results were limited in the second study, which used carbon monoxide monitors, urinary cotinine levels and self-disclosed methods to identify the smoking status with opt-out referrals. Only post-intervention data were available on the uptake of appointments to external stop-smoking services. The number of health professional referrals increased, but change in smoking cessation rates was less clear.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is insufficient evidence to inform practice regarding strategies to increase the uptake of external stop-smoking appointments by women during pregnancy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália