Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of family interventions on communication in the context of anxiety and depression in those aged 14-24 years: systematic review of randomised control trials.
Lloyd, Alex; Broadbent, Amy; Brooks, Edmund; Bulsara, Karen; Donoghue, Kim; Saijaf, Rouhma; Sampson, Katie N; Thomson, Abigail; Fearon, Pasco; Lawrence, Peter J.
Afiliação
  • Lloyd A; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.
  • Broadbent A; Member of the Young People's Advisory Group.
  • Brooks E; Member of the Parents and Carers' Advisory Group.
  • Bulsara K; Member of the Parents and Carers' Advisory Group.
  • Donoghue K; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.
  • Saijaf R; Member of the Young People's Advisory Group.
  • Sampson KN; National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
  • Thomson A; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.
  • Fearon P; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK; and Developmental Neuroscience Unit, Anna Freud Centre, London, UK.
  • Lawrence PJ; School of Psychology, University of Southampton, UK.
BJPsych Open ; 9(5): e161, 2023 Aug 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641851
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The ability to communicate is integral to all human relationships. Previous research has specifically highlighted communication within families as both a risk and protective factor for anxiety disorders and/or depression. Yet, there is limited understanding about whether communication is amenable to intervention in the context of adolescent psychopathology, and whether doing so improves outcomes.

AIMS:

The aim of this systematic review was to determine in which contexts and for whom does addressing communication in families appear to work, not work and why?

METHOD:

We pre-registered our systematic review with PROSPERO (identifier CRD42022298719), followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance and assessed study quality with the Risk of Bias 2 tool.

RESULTS:

Seven randomised controlled trials were identified from a systematic search of the literature. There was significant heterogeneity in the features of communication that were measured across these studies. There were mixed findings regarding whether family-focused interventions led to improvements in communication. Although there was limited evidence that family-focused interventions led to improvements in communication relative to interventions without a family-focused component, we discuss these findings in the context of the significant limitations in the studies reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS:

We conclude that further research is required to assess the efficacy of family-focused interventions for improving communication in the context of anxiety and depression in those aged 14-24 years.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido