Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dose Individualization of Cefepime for Febrile Neutropenia in Patients With Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma: Implications for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Oda, Kazutaka; Yamaguchi, Ayami; Matsumoto, Naoya; Nakata, Hirotomo; Higuchi, Yusuke; Nosaka, Kisato; Jono, Hirofumi; Saito, Hideyuki.
Afiliação
  • Oda K; Departments of Pharmacy and.
  • Yamaguchi A; Infection Control, Kumamoto University Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan; and.
  • Matsumoto N; Department of Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Nakata H; Department of Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Higuchi Y; Infection Control, Kumamoto University Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan; and.
  • Nosaka K; Infection Control, Kumamoto University Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan; and.
  • Jono H; Infection Control, Kumamoto University Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan; and.
  • Saito H; Departments of Pharmacy and.
Ther Drug Monit ; 46(1): 80-88, 2024 02 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37735762
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Optimal cefepime dosing is a challenge because of its dose-dependent neurotoxicity. This study aimed to determine individualized cefepime dosing for febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

METHODS:

This prospective study enrolled 16 patients receiving cefepime at a dose of 2 g every 12 hours. Unbound concentrations were determined at 0.5 hours, 7.2 hours [at the 60% time point of the 12 hours administration interval (C7.2h)], and 11 hours (trough concentration) after the first infusion (rate 2 g/h). The primary and secondary end points were the predictive performance of the area under the unbound concentration-time curve (AUC unbound ) and the effect of unbound cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters on clinical response, respectively.

RESULTS:

The mean (SD) AUC unbound was 689.7 (226.6) mcg h/mL, which correlated with C7.2h (R 2 = 0.90), and the Bayesian posterior AUC unbound using only the trough concentration (R 2 = 0.66). Although higher exposure was more likely to show a better clinical response, each parameter did not indicate a statistical significance between positive and negative clinical responses ( P = 0.0907 for creatinine clearance (Ccr), 0.2523 for C7.2h, 0.4079 for trough concentration, and 0.1142 for AUC unbound ). Cutoff values were calculated as 80.2 mL/min for Ccr (sensitivity 0.889, specificity 0.714), 18.6 mcg/mL for C7.2h (sensitivity 0.571, specificity 1.000), and 9.2 mcg/mL for trough concentration (sensitivity 0.571, specificity 1.000). When aiming for a time above 100% the minimum inhibitory concentration, both continuous infusion of 4 g/d and intermittent infusion of 2 g every 8 hours achieved a probability of approximately 100% at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 mcg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS:

Therapeutic drug monitoring by sampling at C7.2h or trough can facilitate rapid dose optimization. Continuous infusion of 4 g/d was recommended. Intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 hours was alternatively suggested for patients with a Ccr of 60-90 mL/min.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neutropenia Febril / Linfoma / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ther Drug Monit Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neutropenia Febril / Linfoma / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ther Drug Monit Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article