Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nasal Epistaxis Balloons: A Comprehensive MAUDE Database Analysis.
Merrill, Tyler B; Pool, Christopher D; Saadi, Robert A; Patel, Vijay A.
Afiliação
  • Merrill TB; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA. Electronic address: tmerrill@uams.edu.
  • Pool CD; Kaiser Permanente Orange County, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Saadi RA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.
  • Patel VA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: vijayapatel@live.com.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(1): 104069, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37862881
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

While nasal epistaxis balloons are generally seen as safe and routinely utilized by both surgical and nonsurgical providers, the complication profile related to this type of device has not been well defined.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to utilize the FDA MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database to better assess adverse events (AE) related to use of nasal epistaxis balloons. Reports were individually tabulated and events were categorized with special attention to AEs.

METHODS:

The FDA MAUDE database was queried for all medical device reports (MDR) related to nasal epistaxis balloon devices from January 2012 to November 2022.

RESULTS:

19 MDRs met inclusion criteria. 5 MDRs were classified as device related (26.3 %); two events were reported for balloon leak and deflation, two events were reported for device breakage, and one device related event was unknown. 14 MDRs (73.7 %) were classified as patient related. Two documented MDRs were patient deaths due to exsanguination. Additional serious AEs included balloon ingestion and subsequent small bowel perforation (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 1), skull base violation and intracranial placement of the device (n = 1), and respiratory distress (n = 3).

CONCLUSION:

Though epistaxis control with nasal balloons is generally seen as a safe procedure, there have been several concerning AEs reported. While two reports of death due to exsanguination were the most severe AEs, multiple other life-threatening AEs were also documented. Increased awareness of associated complications can be used to better counsel patients during the informed consent process as well as providers in their clinical decision making.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epistaxe / Exsanguinação Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Otolaryngol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epistaxe / Exsanguinação Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Otolaryngol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article