Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevention of contamination after endotracheal intubation using a dedicated sleeve.
Pino, Alejandro; Lee, Justin J; Hashmi, Nazish K; Brucker, Amanda; Chow, Shein-Chung; Mahmood, Kamran.
Afiliação
  • Pino A; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Lee JJ; Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
  • Hashmi NK; Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Brucker A; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Chow SC; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Mahmood K; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Thorac Dis ; 15(9): 4717-4724, 2023 Sep 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37868844
ABSTRACT

Background:

Contamination of work surfaces by used laryngoscopes after endotracheal intubation is a serious infection control concern but no strategies are available to address it. We assessed if contamination of the surfaces after endotracheal intubation would be reduced when providers used a dedicated, self-erected, disposable plastic sleeve (BladePouch) to store the used laryngoscope as compared to using single gloves or double gloves and sheathing the laryngoscope with the outer gloves.

Methods:

Twenty participants were recruited including attending physicians, trainees and allied health care professionals. They performed endotracheal intubation on a mannequin with oral cavity coated with a dye and stored the used laryngoscope blade using single gloves, double gloves or BladePouch. Each participant used both direct and video laryngoscopes. Following intubation, dye contamination of gloves, gown and work surface was evaluated.

Results:

There was no difference in the contamination of gloves or gowns between the single gloves, double gloves or BladePouch groups. However, work surface contamination was significantly reduced when using BladePouch compared to single or double gloves (13% vs. 100% vs. 80% respectively, P<0.001). The odds of work surface contamination were significantly lower with BladePouch vs. single or double gloves, even when adjusted for intubation device, role and experience of participants with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.0054 (95% confidence interval 0.0009-0.0314), P<0.001.

Conclusions:

In conjunction with standard precautions, the use of a dedicated plastic sleeve to store contaminated laryngoscope blade after endotracheal intubation may reduce the work surface contamination, independent of intubation device, role and experience of providers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Dis Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Dis Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos