Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey.
Rhodes, Sarah; Demou, Evangelia; Wilkinson, Jack; Cherrie, Mark; Edge, Rhiannon; Gittins, Matthew; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Kromydas, Theocharis; Mueller, William; Pearce, Neil; van Tongeren, Martie.
Afiliação
  • Rhodes S; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Sarah.A.Rhodes@manchester.ac.uk.
  • Demou E; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Wilkinson J; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Cherrie M; Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Edge R; Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • Gittins M; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Katikireddi SV; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Kromydas T; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Mueller W; Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Pearce N; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygeine and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • van Tongeren M; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Occup Environ Med ; 2023 Dec 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38124150
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess variation in vaccination uptake across occupational groups as a potential explanation for variation in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

DESIGN:

We analysed data from the UK Office of National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey linked to vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System in England from 1 December 2020 to 11 May 2022. We analysed vaccination uptake and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by occupational group and assessed whether adjustment for vaccination reduced the variation in risk between occupational groups.

RESULTS:

Estimated rates of triple vaccination were high across all occupational groups (80% or above), but were lowest for food processing (80%), personal care (82%), hospitality (83%), manual occupations (84%) and retail (85%). High rates were observed for individuals working in health (95% for office based, 92% for those in patient-facing roles) and education (91%) and office-based workers not included in other categories (90%). The impact of adjusting for vaccination when estimating relative risks of infection was generally modest (ratio of hazard ratios across all occupational groups reduced from 1.37 to 1.32), but was consistent with the hypothesis that low vaccination rates contribute to elevated risk in some groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Variation in vaccination coverage might account for a modest proportion of occupational differences in infection risk. Vaccination rates were uniformly very high in this cohort, which may suggest that the participants are not representative of the general population. Accordingly, these results should be considered tentative pending the accumulation of additional evidence.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Occup Environ Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Occup Environ Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido