Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A semi-automatic segmentation method for meningioma developed using a variational approach model.
Burrows, Liam; Patel, Jay; Islim, Abdurrahman I; Jenkinson, Michael D; Mills, Samantha J; Chen, Ke.
Afiliação
  • Burrows L; Department of Mathematical Sciences and Centre for Mathematical Imaging Techniques, University of Liverpool, UK.
  • Patel J; Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Islim AI; Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, University of Manchester, UK.
  • Jenkinson MD; Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Hospital, Northren Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Mills SJ; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Chen K; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, UK.
Neuroradiol J ; 37(2): 199-205, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146866
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Meningioma is the commonest primary brain tumour. Volumetric post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recognised as gold standard for delineation of meningioma volume but is hindered by manual processing times. We aimed to investigate the utility of a model-based variational approach in segmenting meningioma.

METHODS:

A database of patients with a meningioma (2007-2015) was queried for patients with a contrast-enhanced volumetric MRI, who had consented to a research tissue biobank. Manual segmentation by a neuroradiologist was performed and results were compared to the mathematical model, using a battery of tests including the Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DICE) and JACCARD index. A publicly available meningioma dataset (708 segmented T1 contrast-enhanced slices) was also used to test the reliability of the model.

RESULTS:

49 meningioma cases were included. The most common meningioma location was convexity (n = 15, 30.6%). The mathematical model segmented all but one incidental meningioma, which failed due to the lack of contrast uptake. The median meningioma volume by manual segmentation was 19.0 cm3 (IQR 4.9-31.2). The median meningioma volume using the mathematical model was 16.9 cm3 (IQR 4.6-28.34). The mean DICE score was 0.90 (SD = 0.04). The mean JACCARD index was 0.82 (SD = 0.07). For the publicly available dataset, the mean DICE and JACCARD scores were 0.90 (SD = 0.06) and 0.82 (SD = 0.10), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Segmentation of meningioma volume using the proposed mathematical model was possible with accurate results. Application of this model on contrast-enhanced volumetric imaging may help reduce work burden on neuroradiologists with the increasing number in meningioma diagnoses.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Meníngeas / Meningioma Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiol J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Meníngeas / Meningioma Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiol J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido