America's perceptions of opioid related impairment: A national randomized study examining how different individuals may stigmatize addiction in response to different terminology.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prior research has found that different ways of describing opioid-related impairment influences the types and degrees of stigmatizing beliefs held by the American public. In this study we examined the extent to which different characteristics of the American public (i.e., age, gender, race/ethnicity, religiosity, sexual orientation, political affiliation, personal history of addiction/mental health problem) are associated with holding different types and degrees of stigmatizing beliefs when asked to consider someone treated for opioid-related impairment. We also assessed whether any observed differences in stigmatizing beliefs related to participant characteristics are dependent on how an opioid-impaired patient is described in terms of both the nature of the impairment (e.g., as a "chronically relapsing brain disease", "brain disease", "disease", "illness", "disorder", or "problem") as well as the gender of the depicted opioid-impaired person. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of the U.S. population (N = 3643) was randomized to one of six vignettes describing a patient being treated for opioid-related impairment that differed only in the way the impairment was described (as a "chronically relapsing brain disease", "brain disease", "disease", "illness", "disorder", or "problem"). Participants subsequently were asked to rate statements assessing five stigma dimensions (blame, prognostic pessimism, continuing care, dangerousness, and social distance). RESULTS: Several characteristics were associated with different types and higher levels of stigmatizing beliefs older age, male gender, White race, heterosexual orientation, being religious, Republican political affiliation, and having no prior alcohol/drug or mental health problem history (ps < 0.001). With very few exceptions, the way the opioid-impairment was described or whether the depicted patient was a man or a woman did not influence the strength of these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Certain characteristics of members of the US population were associated with holding different types and degrees of stigmatizing attitudes when asked to consider someone receiving treatment for opioid-related impairment and these were largely unaffected by how the impairment was labeled or the opioid-impaired person's gender. Depending on the specific target of clinical and public health anti-stigma campaigns, both addiction terminology and the beliefs held by certain population sub-groups will need to be considered when creating opioid use disorder related anti-stigma campaigns.