Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biodiversity and human health: A scoping review and examples of underrepresented linkages.
Robinson, Jake M; Breed, Andrew C; Camargo, Araceli; Redvers, Nicole; Breed, Martin F.
Afiliação
  • Robinson JM; College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia. Electronic address: jake.robinson@flinders.edu.au.
  • Breed AC; Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water, and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia; School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld, Australia.
  • Camargo A; Centric Lab, London, United Kingdom.
  • Redvers N; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Breed MF; College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Environ Res ; 246: 118115, 2024 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38199470
ABSTRACT
Mounting evidence supports the connections between exposure to environmental typologies(such as green and blue spaces)and human health. However, the mechanistic links that connect biodiversity (the variety of life) and human health, and the extent of supporting evidence remain less clear. Here, we undertook a scoping review to map the links between biodiversity and human health and summarise the levels of associated evidence using an established weight of evidence framework. Distinct from other reviews, we provide additional context regarding the environment-microbiome-health axis, evaluate the environmental buffering pathway (e.g., biodiversity impacts on air pollution), and provide examples of three under- or minimally-represented linkages. The examples are (1) biodiversity and Indigenous Peoples' health, (2) biodiversity and urban social equity, and (3) biodiversity and COVID-19. We observed a moderate level of evidence to support the environmental microbiota-human health pathway and a moderate-high level of evidence to support broader nature pathways (e.g., greenspace) to various health outcomes, from stress reduction to enhanced wellbeing and improved social cohesion. However, studies of broader nature pathways did not typically include specific biodiversity metrics, indicating clear research gaps. Further research is required to understand the connections and causative pathways between biodiversity (e.g., using metrics such as taxonomy, diversity/richness, structure, and function) and health outcomes. There are well-established frameworks to assess the effects of broad classifications of nature on human health. These can assist future research in linking biodiversity metrics to human health outcomes. Our examples of underrepresented linkages highlight the roles of biodiversity and its loss on urban lived experiences, infectious diseases, and Indigenous Peoples' sovereignty and livelihoods. More research and awareness of these socioecological interconnections are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biodiversidade / Poluição do Ar Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Environ Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biodiversidade / Poluição do Ar Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Environ Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article