A cortically-weighted versus total Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in thrombectomy outcome models.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Individual subcortical infarct scoring for the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) can be difficult and is subjected to higher inter-reader variability. This study compares performance of the 10-point ASPECTS with a new 7-point cortically-weighted score in predicting post-thrombectomy functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective registry data from two comprehensive stroke centers (Site 1 2016-2021; Site 2 2019-2021) included patients with either M1 segment of middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusions who underwent thrombectomy. Two multivariate proportional odds training models utilizing either 10-point or 7-point ASPECTS predicting 90-day shift in modified Rankin score were generated using Site 1 data and validated with Site 2 data. Models were compared using multiclass receiver operator characteristics, corrected Akaike's Information Criterion, and likelihood ratio test. RESULTS: Of 328 patients (Site 1 = 181, Site 2 = 147), median age was 71y (IQR 61-82), 119 (36%) had internal carotid artery occlusions, and median 10-point ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 8-10). There was no difference in performance between models using either total or cortically-weighted ASPECTS (p=0.14). Validation cohort data were correctly (i.e., predicting modified Rankin score within one point) classified 50% (cortically-weighted score model) and 56% (total score model) of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-point cortically-weighted ASPECTS was similarly predictive of post-thrombectomy functional outcome as 10-point ASPECTS. Given noninferior performance, the cortically-weighted score is a potentially reliable, but simplified, alternative to the traditional scoring paradigm, with potential implications in automated image analysis tool development.