Current situation and influence factors of scientific integrity in China: A multicenter survey.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
; 11(2): 100365, 2024 Feb.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38304226
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Cases of scientific misconduct have occurred frequently, especially in the field of medical research. We collected electronic questionnaires from 1257 medical staff in 43 cities and obtained a cross-sectional data set of their understanding of scientific integrity in research. This study aims to propose recommendations for establishing a mature oversight system for research integrity.Methods:
The study employed multiple regression analysis to explore the effect of different factors on the perception of four types of research integrity.Results:
Female participants had a higher understanding of project application integrity than men (P < â 0.001). Participants in clinical departments had a lower understanding of project application integrity than those in nursing departments (clinical vs. nursing, P â= 0.046). Participants with a junior college degree or below had a lower understanding than those who had a postgraduate degree and doctoral degree (junior college or below vs. postgraduate degree, P â< â0.001; junior college or below vs. doctoral degree, P â< â0.001).Conclusions:
We found that female, medical technology department, advanced education background, and advanced professional titles were significantly associated with a higher understanding of scientific integrity in research in China.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
China