Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of prehabilitation on outcomes following total knee and hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Adebero, Tony; Omana, Humberto; Somerville, Lyndsay; Lanting, Brent; Hunter, Susan W.
Afiliação
  • Adebero T; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • Omana H; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • Somerville L; Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • Lanting B; Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • Hunter SW; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil ; : 1-20, 2024 Feb 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349251
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To quantify the effectiveness of prehabilitation prior to total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) for osteoarthritis on postoperative outcomes assessed by self-report and performance-based measures.

METHODS:

Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Scopus (inception-August 2022) were searched for randomized controlled trials. Self-report outcomes were function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and pain. Performance-based outcomes were strength, range of motion (ROM), balance, and functional mobility. The RoB 2.0 assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed up to 52 weeks after TKA/THA.

RESULTS:

High risk of bias was found in 24 of 28 trials. Prehabilitation improved function (SMD = 0.50 [95%CI 0.23, 0.77]), pain (SMD = 0.44 [95%CI 0.17, 0.71]), HRQoL (SMD = 0.28 [95%CI 0.12, 0.43]), strength (SMD = 0.72 [95%CI 0.47, 0.98]), ROM (SMD = 0.31 [95%CI 0.02, 0.59]), and functional mobility (SMD = 0.39 [95%CI 0.05, 0.73]) post-TKA. No significant effect of prehabilitation on balance (SMD = 0.28 [95%CI -0.11, 0.66]) post-TKA. All outcomes assessed had significant heterogeneity (p < 0.01). There were limited and contradictory trials (n = 2) for THA.

CONCLUSION:

High risk of bias and significant heterogeneity observed in our meta-analysis prevent conclusions regarding prehabilitation effectiveness on outcomes up to one year after TKA/THA.
Prehabilitation has been promoted to improve postoperative outcomes and shorten recovery periods after total knee/hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) for osteoarthritisPrehabilitation improved relevant self-report and performance-based outcomes after TKA surgeryA high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity across trials prevent drawing any conclusionsMore high-quality research is required before recommending the implementation of prehabilitation programs in clinical practice for people awaiting TKA/THA.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Disabil Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Disabil Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá