Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The significance of clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis into the relevance of complete stone clearance.
Kingma, Riemer A; Doppen, Carleen; Bus, Mieke T J; Altobelli, Emanuela; de Jong, Igle Jan; Roemeling, Stijn.
Afiliação
  • Kingma RA; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. r.a.kingma@umcg.nl.
  • Doppen C; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Bus MTJ; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Altobelli E; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • de Jong IJ; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Roemeling S; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 78, 2024 Feb 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353780
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

After treatment for kidney stones, residual fragments with a diameter of ≤ 4 mm are traditionally referred to as 'clinically insignificant residual fragments'. We hypothesize that patients with these fragments are at an increased risk for stone-related morbidity, such as complaints, hydronephrosis, and stone regrowth, when compared to stone-free patients. This study aimed to investigate the relevance of complete stone clearance in surgical treatment of urolithiasis.

METHODS:

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between 2015 and 2020 were included if a CT-scan was available within 6 months after the procedure, and the follow-up duration was at least 1 year. The stone-free status at the end of the first stone episode during the study period was categorized as fully stone-free, not stone-free with small residual fragments (≤ 4 mm) and not stone-free with large residual fragments (> 4 mm). Follow-up data were collected, including stone-related events and re-intervention rates.

RESULTS:

A total of 103 subjects were included with a median follow-up of 21.4 months. Stone-related events occurred in 10 (29.4%) of the fully stone-free subjects, 20 (58.8%) of the subjects with small residual fragments and 25 (71.4%) of the subjects with large residual fragments. The stone-related event-free survival per subgroup resulted in a significantly different survival distribution in a log rank test (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION:

A complete stone-free status seems to be of fundamental importance for decreasing stone-related morbidity. Further developments and research should focus on optimizing the full clearance of stone material during PCNL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Urolitíase / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea / Hidronefrose Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Urolitíase / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea / Hidronefrose Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda